Skip to main content

The Coming Rise of Stem Cell Research

The government sponsorship of embryonic stem cell research has already become a divisive issue in modern culture and I predict it will become even more so in the next few years. On many issues, there is a clear dividing line that separates those who’s decision making are guided primarily by absolute moral ethics verses those who adjust their philosophy based on the transitory popular or emotional sentiment. I suspect however when it comes to the issue of federal funding and thus advocacy for more stem cell research, this dividing line will begin to disappear. The prospect of uncovering cures for killer illnesses that has impacted millions of lives will be too emotional a burden for most people regardless of their ideology. Most people will relate first and foremost to the wrenching impact of losing a loved one or preventing the loss of a future loved one, if stem cell research can produce the breakthroughs that the scientists suggest. But at what cost and to whom?

Scientists speculate that stem cells hold great potential for treating or curing illnesses, including juvenile diabetes and Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine, a new report from the National Academies, says that public funding of research on human stem cells derived from both adults and embryos provides the most efficient and responsible means to fulfill the promise of stem cells for achieving medical breakthroughs.1 The real promise say the scientists is in the lines of embryonic stem cells. Couples who have difficulty conceiving, go through the process of artificial fertilization in an attempt to get pregnant. It is common that in this process multiple “spare” embryos are created. The unused embryos are then discarded. The stem cell proponent’s theory is based on their interpretation that these embryos do not constitute legitimate human life. This despite the fact that it is the very humanness of the embryos that make them valuable to the scientists. Instead of throwing them away, the proponents argue that the embryos be allowed to be used for stem-cell harvesting instead. Why not use these "spare embryos" to help save lives?

Biblically, I submit that the original problem is not initially with stem-cell research, but the earlier decision to sanction another scientifically driven process namely artificial fertilization. The moral dilemma attached to embryonic stem cell harvesting is the inevitable slope that you take when you reject God's decision or timing - in this example, by not accepting apparent infertility, and working around it using human effort.

The skeptic may state: who's to say that God did not allow the knowledge of artificial fertilization in order to allow for child bearing?

I think a biblical answer to such matters can be found in the Book of Genesis, when Abraham and Sarah performed their version of artificial fertilization some 4,000 years ago (also working around apparent infertility). The outcome? Ishmael – the son born to Sarah’s Egyptian slave - and the world is still paying for that decision in the form of Ishmael's offspring the Arabs (September 11th being a vivid example). God was very predictive about this offspring when He said among other things in Genesis 16-12 "...his hand will be against everyone and everyone's hand against him."

As the Apostle Paul said in 1 Corinthians 6:12 "...Everything is permissible for me, but not everything is beneficial.” Just because man can "create life" via artificial fertilization, doesn't mean that he should. Please note: this statement is not a value judgment on the children that have resulted from artificial fertilization, because ultimately it is still God who allows them to be born.

1- Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine (2002) - Commission on Life Sciences

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Funerals for the Unsaved or Unbelievers

I am not a leader of a church, but I oftentimes wonder how does one lead a funeral service for someone who dies without knowing Jesus Christ as Lord? Admittedly I have not been to many funerals in my lifetime, though they are appearing to come more frequently lately, but the fact is that funerals are held daily throughout the world and as such this is a pertinent question to someone just about every day.

I’ve been to the funeral where the person lived a fairly routine life, taking care of their families and other responsibilities as best they could, paying taxes and doing the average things that we as human beings do on a consistent basis. They however had no visible relationship with God through His son Jesus Christ. When this person dies, the surviving family members are oftentimes left scrambling trying to find a person and a place to officiate the funeral services – generally because the deceased did not have a regular church that they attended. Funeral homes sometimes serve this f…

Scripture: Are You a Wheat or Weed?

(Matthew 23: 24-30 NIV): Jesus told them another parable: “The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away. When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared. “The owner’s servants came to him and said, ‘Sir, didn’t you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?’ ‘‘An enemy did this,’ he replied. “The servants asked him, ‘Do you want us to go and pull them up?’ ‘‘No,’ he answered, ‘because while you are pulling the weeds, you may uproot the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.’”

(Matthew 23: 36-43 NIV): Then he left the crowd and went into the house. His disciples came to him and said, “Explain to us the parable of the weeds in the field.” He answered, “The…

Hal Lindsay off TBN

Christian author and broadcaster Hal Lindsay removed his weekly Christian television news broadcast "The International Intelligence Briefing" from the programming lineup on The Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) after network officials notified him that his shows would now be subject to pre-screening for censorship prior to broadcast approval. This unusual step was the result of TBN’s disapproval of a Lindsay broadcast in December 2005, which the network said was too inflammatory towards Muslims.

I have reviewed the transcript of Mr. Lindsay's broadcast and I find nothing in it’s content that is not backed up by God’s scripture, nor did I find anything that would be considered overly zealous or purposefully sensational with respect to potential attacks on Muslims. To the extent that TBN, one of the most widely available Christian TV networks would take this position is quite incredulous. One of the reasons for the need for ‘Christian’ TV networks is to enable the presenta…