Skip to main content

"And God Said To Me…"

As a general rule, we live in a world that is made up mostly of people who either a) believe that God exists, but will not submit to his commands as stated in the Bible; b) does not believe that God exists; or c) believes that God exists and have accepted God’s Word as truth. Group ‘c’ comprises the smallest percentage of these three groups and is made up mostly of believers in Jesus Christ. The task that believers have in life is to present their belief to the other two groups in the hope of persuading them to change. Many do so to varying degrees of success, but oftentimes their methods and more importantly their motivation is a hindrance to true evangelism.

One character trait used by some believers that appear to be an instant sign of non-credibility with unbelievers is the utterance of the phrase “…and God said to me” or “God told me to say…” The continuation of any statements after the use of these phrases is usually met with extreme pessimism or ridicule by a non-believing world based on the assumption that God does not talk to people. So where does this motivation come from? Either the believer truly believes that God actually said something to them, or they think God said something to them, or they are attempting to falsely project some kind of special supernatural ability.

A study of the Bible showed that there are roughly 250 instances of the phrase “the Lord said to…” some person. Interestingly however, only 2 times does that phrase occur in the New Testament; and both times it was related to the Apostle Paul – once to Ananias to go tell Paul about God’s task for him: But the Lord said to Ananias, "Go! This man is my chosen instrument to carry my name before the Gentiles and their kings and before the people of Israel. I will show him how much he must suffer for my name." (Acts 9: 15-16 NIV); and once to Paul himself when He was being told about his primary task for God: "Then the Lord said to me, `Go; I will send you far away to the Gentiles.' " (Acts 22:21). Additionally, the phrase “God said to…” appears 30 times throughout the Bible but none originally during the New Testament.

So what are we to make of this relative silence in the Bible of direct divine communication between God and man after Christ ascended back to heaven during the age of the New Testament? And how does this contrast to the regular suggestion of this type of communication during our lifetimes? The law of averages alone suggests that not all modern Christians who represent that they received direct communication from God is being disingenuous. Similarly, the law of averages as well as carnal human nature also suggests that many probably heard no such thing. I believe the answer lies in the working of the Holy Spirit of God – the oft forgotten or ignored aspect of God’s relationship with man.

To contrast with the overwhelming Old Testament occurrences of biblical references to God’s direct communication with men, the bible records virtually no Old Testament account of the Holy Spirit being the initiator of human communication. In fact there are only 3 direct references to the Holy Spirit before the life of Christ. There are however, 90 references to various works of the Holy Spirit throughout the New Testament. There are 5 direct references to people speaking based on the presence of the Holy Spirit in their lives: When Elizabeth heard Mary's greeting, the baby leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. In a loud voice she exclaimed: "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear! (Luke 1:41 NIV); His father Zechariah was filled with the Holy Spirit and prophesied: “Praise be to the Lord, the God of Israel, because he has come and has redeemed his people. (Luke 1:67-68 NIV); All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them. (Acts 2:4 NIV); Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them: "Rulers and elders of the people…" (Acts 4:8 NIV); After they prayed, the place where they were meeting was shaken. And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God boldly. (Acts 4:31 NIV); Then Saul, who was also called Paul, filled with the Holy Spirit, looked straight at Elymas and said, "You are a child of the devil and an enemy of everything that is right… (Acts 13:9-10 NIV).

It is not surprising that the communication between the Holy Spirit and man was mostly conveyed throughout the Book of Acts, as this was the historical account of when God started the “Church Age” which is still in effect up through today. I submit that all genuine accounts of people being given special revelation from God through the present time, is by way of The Holy Spirit. But that is rarely how such communication is presented by those affected. As stated at the top, it is common for people to state “God told me…”; very rarely do you hear people say (particularly among a crowd of non-believers) that “the Holy Spirit said to me or revealed to me…” Unfortunately, the ugly history of major sections of the church and their unwillingness to acknowledge the Holy Spirit has helped to build a stigma against such talk among believers. Believers many times don’t want to appear “crazy” to non-believers by talking about some “Holy Spirit”. And the devil would not have it any other way.

The scriptures says in the Book of Hebrews: But Christ is faithful as a son over God's house. And we are his house, if we hold on to our courage and the hope of which we boast. So, as the Holy Spirit says:” Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts…” (Hebrews 3:6-8 NIV). Until the Holy Spirit becomes a more visible and audible part of the church culture and lexicon, this problem of getting an unbelieving world to take us seriously when well meaning Christians convey some special divine communication will never happen…and the influence of the Church will continue to be muted.

Popular posts from this blog

Ignore God and Decrease Your Birth Rates

I read a very interesting article yesterday in the New York Times on the topic of the shrinking birth rate in Europe over the past few decades. The article outlines the demographic danger facing Europe with the high likelihood that several countries (Italy, Spain and Germany among others) will see their native populations decrease by up to 40% by 2050. According to the article, the replacement birth rate necessary to maintain an equal population size from generation to generation is 2.1 children born to each woman. In Europe according to the article the rate is well below 2.0, with some countries closer to 1.5 and dropping. It is a lengthy and very interesting read that sheds some light on a phenomenon that in all likelihood will reshape the face of Western Europe within 100 years. The interesting thing about the article is that it was published after extensive research and interviews with many experts and it offers various possible explanations for why this situation has developed.

Funerals for the Unsaved or Unbelievers

I am not a leader of a church, but I oftentimes wonder how does one lead a funeral service for someone who dies without knowing Jesus Christ as Lord ? Admittedly I have not been to many funerals in my lifetime, though they are appearing to come more frequently lately, but the fact is that funerals are held daily throughout the world and as such this is a pertinent question to someone just about every day.   I’ve been to the funeral where the person lived a fairly routine life, taking care of their families and other responsibilities as best they could, paying taxes and doing the average things that we as human beings do on a consistent basis. They however had no visible relationship with God through His son Jesus Christ. When this person dies, the surviving family members are oftentimes left scrambling trying to find a person and a place to officiate the funeral services – generally because the deceased did not have a regular church that they attended. Funeral homes sometimes serve thi

Mother Jesus?

The Episcopal Church USA continues to stake out their territory as a “church unto itself” as opposed to a part of Christ’s body of believers with such decisions as 2003’s approval of the New Hampshire Diocese's election of V. Gene Robinson, as the organization’s first openly gay bishop. This year the “church” elected liberal Katherine Jefferts Schori as their leader. Along comes this not surprising bit of information about Ms. Schori courtesy of Newsbusters.org . Most recently, she irritated some conservatives by speaking about "Mother Jesus" in a sermon....the website then goes on to quote Washington Post reporter Alan Cooperman who stated: To those who accuse her of heresy for referring to a female Jesus, she responds with a typically learned disquisition on medieval mystics and saints who used similar language, including Julian of Norwich and St. Teresa of Avila. "I was trying to say that the work of the cross was in some ways like giving birth to a new creation,